(An attempt to clarify my own beliefs, tracing the winding thought and spirit path to them)
Revelation or Wishful Thinking?
There are those have had said they have had life-changing spiritual "revelations,"by a vision; mvoices heard; out of body experiences; feelings of being directed guided, saved or found. And there is a history of mystics who have experienced such and have since been considered spiritual teachers themselves, Christian mystics: Meister Eckhardt, Hildegard von Bingen, Julian of Norwich, as well many from other religious traditions.
I do wonder if some of said "super sensible" experiences came from subconscious influences: wishful thinking, desire for comfort, peace, certainty, or to cope with desperate life situations. However, those experiences come, there must a coming down from the proverbial "mountain top" to live by what they now "know," or believe has been revealed as absolute truth. Some may also feel they need to evangelize to share and save other souls.
I have not had a clear, powerful spiritual revelation. I have had intuitions and insights shaping my present state of spirituality.
Of course, there does not have to be a clear revelation for belief of any kind. People may turn to sacred texts, such as the Bible or Koran, as either guiding wisdom or literal interpretations/dictates. Others, such as myself feel, and thus believe, that no one religion is the true and only one. Neither do I believe that organized religion is a prerequisite to be a good, moral human being; however, I cannot imagine being so without having embraced at least solid values to live by, often contained in religion, but also to be intuited and/or found elsewhere: family upbringing, community, and in sources of research and learning, such as literature, philosophy, psychology, history and science.
I believe if we were created with the capacities we have for thinking, free will and freedom, then we must think and sort things out spiritually and otherwise for ourselves, not simply blindly following the dictates of any one book or religion. Coming to values and principles on our own often involves a healthy balance of openness, curiosity, observation, skepticism and critical thinking, as well as sometimes "holding" questions instead of seeking answers. Spiritual growth can also involve a re-orientation in our beliefs from time to time, as we explore and embrace what feels right and makes sense to us.
I realize I may be accused of being hard-hearted, as I have not embraced any one faith, or that I cherry-pick what to believe or not, that I am not able/willing to submit to any one religious tradition. I confess to all of the above, except being hard-hearted. I see it more as open-hearted. I have been called a "free thinker," which was not meant as a compliment, but is I hope an accurate description which I do embrace. I have been given free will, and the capacity to learn "how' to think instead of "what" to think, and I intend to use these gifts wisely and well.
What Kind of God Don't You Believe In?
A friend of mine who has a clear understanding and practice of her faith of once asked me, "What kind of god don't you believe in?" I appreciated the question, as it made me think of what
"version" of a god I had been taught about in my Catholic upbringing. That version seemed a micro-manger with a plan for me, to whom I had to confess my sins (to a priest, not directly to God). There was no mention, as I recall, of joy, love and being created in God's image. I could not have described it then, but since realized what came across was contradictory, patriarchal, anthropomorphic god who "responds" arbitrarily to the prayers of his faithful, his having woefully ignored those of his "so called" chosen people who implored him from concentration camps.
I do not believe in a god who created human beings simply to worship/adore and obey him, who had, as some Christian sects believe speak of a pre-ordained "elect" group to be saved, while others were created only to be damned. Of course, I also concede that I may be wrong about many things; that is what an open mind is all about, as one can neither know or prove god's existence or not, or what what characteristics are attributed to the god I learned of.
When I do imagine a god I could believe in, it would be a god as "father," which is in fact, an attribute I have heard in my early religious training. Experience and reason tells me tells me, an ideal father does not want to be adored, worshipped or to instill fear in his children. Rather, a father encourages, supports and comforts his children, is fair, compassionate and unconditionally loves through thick and thin, is firm, but not vengeful, diciplines as needed, but not punishes. Fathers guide children to a certain point, then must trust that all that has been given and taught will bear fruit. Good fathers also expect that children will make missteps, experiment, may make unwise choices, act impulsively or disobey, as Adam and Eve are said to have done to learn and to become better and more worthy human beings.
I've always questioned, too if God is omniscient/all knowing, also a common attribute, He could not have been "surprised" that his creations disobeyed him, so that so-called "sin" was all part of God's plan, no? And let's not forget that the Adam and Eve's temptation was that they would become like God (in his image.) A wise father/parent does realize that, at times, their children must learn from adversity, rebellion and disobedience, which may result in consciousness and conscience. This is why I believe that this and other biblical and sacred texts are "imaginative pictures/metaphorical lessons to be contemplated, understood and not taken literally.
Problems arise and develop from encountering unexpected situations, and in response, we make choices to cope and probem solve. Learning to cope is part of becoming an adult and more fully human. At times, what we thought would be a wise choice turns out poorly, and what seemed like an unwise choice may lead us in a more positive direction. Trying to do the "right thing" or what we have been we must do, does not always lead to the desired results, thus the expression learning from "the school of hard knocks."
In the Judaeo/Christian traditions, we hear that humans were created in "God's image." I belive it means we are or can become co-creators in our own right, able to bring new things into being: ideas, practical and creative things with the abilities with which we are born. However, we must first recognize and have the opportunity to use our gifts to create the good, the beautiful and the true in our families, communities and professionally, and so fulfill what "should" be a father's intent for his children: to become good parents, neighbors, friends, technicians, teachers, scientists, artists, musicians, writers, poets, thinkers. Unfortunately, there are situations into which people are born that may result in their creating new evils, harm, violence and destruction. Neverthless, I'd like to believe we were created with possibilities greater than we can comprehend or imagine.
Fundamentalism - Belief and Reason
Fundamentalism of any kind narrows and limits knowledge of self and the world, and may prevent our full development of being created in "God's image." People may live good, admirable, moral lives without an organized religion or reference to sacred texts, having developed values from other sources and experience.
My spiritual life has developed from my collective life experiences and influences, including formal and informal education; my relationships and interactions with others, my study and research, based on my: questions, interests, observations, doubts, and my own if not "revelations," then insights and realizations.
Very influential for me have been the psychological, sociological and anthropological perspectives of Joseph Campbell, Carl Jung and Erich Fromm, to name of few. Campbell, in his twelve-year research in three volumes, The Masks of God, posed a question I identified as a key reason I reject fundamentalism in any one tradition: He asks:
"Are modern civilizations to remain spiritually locked from each other in their local notions….and traditions of...myths, stories, and religions, which essentially drive us 'diametrically apart?'"
It seems that, yes, we do largely remain focused on our differences, rather our similarities, causing all manner of conflict, often with attempts to limit or take away others' freedoms by forcing them to think, believe and live as they do, either in families, communities or governments.
It has been a long time coming, but currently a large number of Americans are either supporting or openly promoting "Christian Nationalism," encouraged by elected officials and their followers, who have chosen to ignore the First Amendment to the Constitution:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Campbell's point exactly!
We must remain free to pursue, within the limits of law, the unalienable rights noted in the Declaration of Independence: "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." If we choose to remember or to read history, we know that countries with theocracies eliminate choice, censor and control media/free speech, create false narratives, take away civil rights, discriminate, create fear, chaos, favor the wealthy, and "go after" anyone questioning or criticizing such. Christian Nationalism is thus exclusive, not inclusive, as Christian and other religions teach in one way or another:
- Love your neighbor as yourself. (The current president has said, "I hate democrats," the other half of Americans!).
- Judge not, least you be judged
- What is done to the least of my brothers, this is you do to me.
- Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
The Brain is Wider than the Sky
"Our task now is to learn that, if we can voyage to the ends of the earth and there find ourselves in the aborigine, who most differs from ourselves, we will have made a fruitful pilgrimage. . . .We [will] have come to the end of a long journey and see that the stranger we meet there is no other than ourselves." (Thomas Merton). This is essentially what, in some way, all religions, spiritual leaders and advocates for humanity have taught us through the ages.
Though I do not believe in the stereotypical descriptions of heaven and hell, I can imagine that in an "afterlife" we may be made aware of all that we did or did not do or have brought into being in our time on earth, and maybe experience our transgressions, large and small, as they have affected others and ourselves.
My truth tells me we are not here or were created solely to be obedient, to worship a creator, especially out of fear of sin or punishment, rather, above all to choose and consciously strive to pursue and develop our higher selves, respect and embrace the humanity of others to become fully human--through whatever experiences, resources and sources support that effort.
My spiritual life has been a blending of beliefs--a synthesis--somewhere between reason and imagination, inspiration and intuition, embracing everything that supports the common good. Our spirit, mind, body, heart and soul cannot ultimately be understood, defined or contained in any one way to believe or live, in any one book or any one philosophy.
Every day I experience ambiguity, paradox, and moral dilemmas. I behold the beauty of nature and the cosmos. I am grateful for the goodness, kindness and love of my family, friends and sometimes of "strangers." I am aware of my own inadequacies, falling short and trying again and again. I acutely and painfully aware of suffering, illnesses and deaths occurring at every moment, near and far. And I contemplate with sorrow what I has been lost to me, as well as the blessings I have been given and what may still lie ahead to receive.
It is through my writing that I am able to sort out and clarify what I have experienced, what I think, feel and wish to do and be. There are such complex, diverse, subtle, nuanced and mysterious elements in life that inform or confound our moral/spiritual lives.
Martin Buber defines for me what I have attempted to convey in this writing:
Real faith means holding ourselves open to the unconditional mystery which we encounter in every sphere of our life, and which cannot be comprised in any formula. Real faith means the ability to endure life in the face of this mystery. . . . I do not accept any absolute formulas for living. No preconceived code can see ahead to everything that can happen in a man's life. As we live, we grow and our beliefs change. They must change. So I think we should live with this constant discovery. We should be open to this adventure in heightened awareness of living. We should stake our whole existence on our willingness to explore and experience.
We must affirm, as philosophers and theologians have throughout the ages, that the source is One; the emanations are many, which is to say, infinite or "Just the weight of God."
The Brain—is wider than the Sky—
For—put them side by side—
The one the other will contain
With ease—and You—beside—
The Brain is deeper than the sea—
For—hold them—Blue to Blue—
The one the other will absorb—
As Sponges—Buckets—do—
The Brain is just the weight of God—
For—Heft them—Pound for Pound—
And they will differ—if they do—
As Syllable from Sound
~ Emily Dickinson